|
Post by FastNFancy on Jul 25, 2003 12:51:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeainDennis on Jul 25, 2003 13:01:13 GMT -5
(((FF))) Thanks a bunch. Did you read the part where they said that certain relatives were hoping that Michael would pay for the celebration? I'm like, what's wrong with Janet's money? Can't she spend some of it on her own parents? This seems a little unfair to constantly rely on Michael to pay for everything. No wonder Mikey acts the way he does.
|
|
|
Post by FastNFancy on Jul 25, 2003 15:57:30 GMT -5
Seain...they are probably going to hit Janet up too. That's probably something the media just tucked in there to spice things up a bit. Michael has been supporting them all for years...so he might as well foot the bill for the party cuz he is the only one with any money anyway. Jermaine claims he has money...but there is no evidence of it. What's going on with the cable channel either he or Marlon was investing in? Katherine and Joe are divorced, right? Aren't they still occupying the same living quarters?
|
|
|
Post by SeainDennis on Jul 25, 2003 16:27:53 GMT -5
Well, right about now, Michael looks like he could use a helping hand in the finance dept. In the article, they claim he might be selling Neverland. Janet is loaded considering she gets $60 million for each CD she turns out. I just think it's taking advantage of someone. Michael supports his family ONLY because of his love for his mother. If you have a chance, read the book that Jermaine's ex wrote about the family. I think the name was something about "Jacksons Madness" or something like that. Her name was Margaret Maldando & she also said that Jermaine didn't have any money & he was living off Michael. Plus he gave her an STD. What a guy!
|
|
|
Post by FastNFancy on Jul 25, 2003 17:26:59 GMT -5
I read that book. If Margaret is telling the truth about the madness that's going on in that family, then I truly feel for all of them. It seems Marlon, Tito, and Jackie are the only ones that have any semblance of balance. I thought it was awful the way Jermaine treated Hazel. They went to a party and took Margaret's child. I remember seeing Hazel and Jermaine in a photo in People Mag where Hazel was holding the baby while she was about 7 mos pregnant with Jermaine's child. I guess it was a last ditch attempt for reconcilliation. Eventually, Hazel walked...can't say that I blame her.
|
|